I open up a window for the Raw images and a separate window for the processed ones, both next to each other on the same monitor even though I do have others. I could just as easily send them back to the same folder but I don’t like to take any chances with my RAW files. When I run the images through Denoise, I have the processed images go into a separate folder as a Tiff. So, I just batch process them all through, using the DeNoise settings I find I’m use the most, and then I do a quick before and after a visual scan and compare the RAW with the DeNoise processed image to see if there was any unintended mess up on any of the photos. It takes much longer than that to simply determine if an image contains any noise at all, and you could be wrong if you determine there isn’t any.

OK there were actually more but just to simply visually scan through 4300 photos at the rate of one per second would still take 71 minutes. Consider this: I used this method with the 4300+ photos I came back with from a trip to Italy last September. So I’m not even bothering anymore to waste the considerable time it takes to go through a hundred or more images just to try to search out the noisy ones and process them separately. I’m finding that this is not, in general, harming photos that have no obviously visible noise and in most cases actually even improves them. I’m just offering these remarks as other information which you may find useful.Īs another workaround allowing you to use DeNoise as the first step in processing RAW files, let me explain another alternative.ĭeNoise, at least for me anyway, is doing such a good job in the latest versions that I’ve arrived at the point when I have many photos to process, I now batch process all my RAW photos through DeNoise as my very first step in processing them. I am not disagreeing with Don, because I always find his advice clear, useful, accurate, and I always appreciate the time he spends to help me when needed. JPG exported at 50% quality, with Noise Reduction and Sharpening applied And, as you can see there is a big difference in the result using Auto settings in DeNoise AI (note disregard the Color Noise in the 100% quality image): The first is a JPG with Noise reduction and Sharpening applied to a file of 50% quality whereas the second is a JPG of 100% quality with Noise Reduction and Sharpening turned off before export.

To give you an example of the differences here is the same image exported from Capture One and processed in DeNoise AI. By that I mean a TIF/TIFF, PNG or JPG/JPEG of 100% quality. If you are exporting from say Lightroom or Capture One etc., please make sure you choose a lossless format to export. For example, in ACR, Lightroom, Capture One, Affinity Photo turn off the Noise Reduction & Sharpening before developing or exporting the RAW image. These are:ĭo not apply Noise Reduction or Sharpening before exporting the image to process in DeNoise AI. If your workflow doesn’t allow you to use DeNoise as the first step in processing the RAW files there are some things that will help in getting the best possible noise reduction results consistently. Or we may prefer the RAW processing in products such as Photoshop (ACR) or Affinity Photo etc. But there are many cases where our workflow does not allow this because, for example, the first step in our process may be using a non-destructive RAW editor such as Lightroom, Capture One, ACD See etc., etc. And these can range from inconsistent noise reduction across an image to no apparent noise reduction or even different results using different processing methods such as GPU or CPU/OpenVINO.Īs a general rule of thumb I would recommend using manual settings or the AI Clear model if you don’t have access to the original RAW file of the image.īut the optimum way to to remove noise using DeNoise AI is using the DeNoise Model with a RAW file of the image as input. On the forum I see many posts about DeNoise AI not producing expected results.

Topaz studio 2 user manual